yes, an archive is a very nice thought. if we really established such a thing and it was thorough and thoughtful, I think it'd be nice if it was available on the <a href="http://brainwashed.com">brainwashed.com</a> site.<br>
<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/14/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">C. A. Polk</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
As I said from the outset, the whole "bloggish" thing kinda doesn't sit with<br>me all that great to begin with. But, a friend of mine showed me lj, and I<br>just found it to be very simple, direct and user-friendly. (As opposed to
<br>myspace, which another friend talked me into exploring once, and which I got<br>utterly fed up with in less than 48 hours.)<br><br>And I don't think a separate list is really the way to go either. I mean,<br>hey - look how much we've livened this one up in a few days! : p
<br><br>What has sort of kicked into a bit higher level though, for me, is the<br>suggestion that someone made - forgot who now, I believe it was both Andrew<br>and someone else - that what we do here could possibly form the basis of a
<br>future, in-depth info archive for it all. Which I think would be a really<br>great thing to do. So - let's wish ourselves luck!<br><br>>From: "name pending" <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com
</a>><br>>I think it's a very good idea, and whatever works best is fine. That's how<br>>lj works, and I'm not sure it's the best medium regardless (I'm not a "fan"<br>>of lj). A seperate mailing list perhaps would work instead?
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Grief mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Grief@hollyfeld.org">Grief@hollyfeld.org</a><br><a href="http://www.hollyfeld.org/mailman/listinfo/grief">http://www.hollyfeld.org/mailman/listinfo/grief